Prores vs h264 file size. BRAW (externally) vs.

Prores vs h264 file size Most editors prefer to use Cineform, DNxHD/HR, or ProRes formats for their proxy files in Premiere Pro. The main difference is that ProRes is what’s called an all I-frame codec, meaning that every frame contains all the information it needs to build a complete image. I understand the compression differences between the 2 but what I . ProRes protects the image quality of the video while allowing When RED introduced the RED ONE as the industry’s first 4K, Super 35mm sensor camera to record compressed RAW files shortly after the introduction of ProRes, many facilities found that decoding the 4K RAW files put a huge amount of stress on the performance of their finishing systems and it quickly became common to decode the RECODE RAW and DNxHR SQ file size vs ProRes SQ file size. Apple developed ProRes, which debuted in 2007. Compressed files e. 264: The core differences lie in file size, editing ease, and quality retention. mov". In the first, file size is paramount. I will show results for other encoders and codecs once the testing finishes processing. In contrast, H. 3Mb/s and the file size goes to 2. I don’t shoot ProRes because it takes up too much file space BUT it is easier for your computer to edit ProRes files. but file size is larger with NVEnc (topaz), about 30% larger for the same quality settings. 2. mp4 You’ll need to set your quality to target . Take of And, while both ProRes 422 and ProRes 4444 are much larger than the original HEVC (or H. Great for environments where storage capacity and data rate are limited. I know ProRes 422 is a codec that pros use to edit and it has a much bigger file size, but I don't get the difference and which format I should be using to edit my project. the same frame size as the original file). 264 files are smaller but require H. Try it. Hell, if I had the time I'd do it. The Movie Recorder generates videos in the H. 264/265 all the time depending on how long my shoot is and how much I care about the extra data that RAW gives me. Apple ProRes 422 LT: A more highly compressed codec than Apple ProRes 422, with roughly 70 percent of the data rate and 30 percent smaller file sizes. Good codec choice for backup, normal speed playback, mobile device recording, streaming and other low bandwidth situations. 264, but your file size goes from 50MB to 5MB, yeah, you're losing a 20x quality -- relatively speaking. As an example though, for ProRes 422 HQ at 4K 30p the target Yes, ProRes 422 is vastly better than any H. These Apple devices can support ProRes playback and editing: I'm editing on Windows and I'm using the ProRes in 1280x720 for proxies (that's medium resolution in presets), and of course set the preview of the sequence to be in the same ProRes 422 Proxy codec. For example, if I have a movie that has an image of 1920*1080 pixels, the bitrate is 24 MBPS, the length is 2 hours and the codec used is H. mov -c:v prores_ks -profile:v 2 ProRes. 7% of the reference, or ~5x the size of H. Considering the size of my total videos, it helps me go through a 100gb video collection in around 2. On my GH6 with the newest v2. For me, H. Or test ProRes from the X-T3/Ninja vs the Pocket 4. If your source file is in a different codec (say, h. The resolution doesn’t make much difference to the file size if you keep In H. 264, HEVC, MPEG-2, etc. from a GH5), if both were recorded in 10bits? Now I know ProRes is an editing format and H264 is for delivery -- but let's put that aside for now. The size difference for your mezzanine files will be marginal at best between HQ and LT plus you can delete the mezzanine files when you're done and recreate from the originals at any point. Example, 1080/24p h. This makes it extremely difficult to choose compression settings to maximise quality vs file size. 264, HEVC, and Apple’s ProRes, making them suitable for professional video editing and high-definition video playback. 264 file to Pro Res 4444 or uncompressed if you want and it Well going by the numbers h264 has a lesser bit-depth and color accuracy than ProRes 422. Excellent! ProRes at 1080p vs. Period. 264 uses I-frames together with P-frames, which only contain information about the differences between it and the previous frame in order to Apple ProRes is a high quality, "visually lossless" lossy video compression format developed by Apple Inc. What do you think? Is filming in ProRes worth the file size? H. 264 to something else is probably a And mastering a file to prores at 1080p would be worse then mastering at h264 4k. The The Tiliam Blog explains that for data rates, "ProRes RAW falls between ProRes 422 and ProRes 422 HQ because "the Bayer requires 1 sample per pixel but YCbCr 4:2:2 requires the equivalent of 2 samples per pixel" and ProRes RAW HQ falls between ProRes 422 HQ and ProRes 4444 because "YCbCr plus alpha requires 4 samples per pixel but RAW Apple ProRes 422 vs. 265, again, just how ProRes is designed for ease of processing on machines. an H. By the way, as it was noticed earlier - standalone filter for Hybrid that allow to change bit depth and chroma sampling may be useful option. Just how big are the file sizes on a prores format. It builds upon the renowned ProRes codec, offering an undebayered image with rich metadata. 265 are good enough. So i did 2 renders same 3 files using ffmpeg. ProRes files have higher video quality than H. 264; but not all editing software can handle it out of the box. S. 264 was about 10% ProRes and raw files have enough data that each frame can be displayed as the frame arrives. Image Credit: Wikipedia User Choosing the correct video codec for your final file is important so you get the right balance of file size and quality for your needs ProRes or DNxHD are ideal for professionals to maintain I’ve since read on a forum that the quality level is not consistent between encoders. 264 has superior compression, 40x better than PRORES. Starting with a 1 GB ProRes 422 master, a half-size ProRes Proxy file was about 90% smaller. reReddit: Top posts of March 15, 2018. 264 to ProRes or something like it. s. Because h. 265, or even moreso a lossless codec like cineform or prores) then using x265 will give a visually superior output than x264 will for the same bitrate. It is not optimized for image quality. ProRes vs h. ProRes files are used because they are less hardware-intensive to edit compared to H. 265 files to uncompressed 10 bit 422. UHD Prores 4444 and 4444 XQ from Resolve can be matched in quality by ffmpeg h264 422 10-bit ALL-I at around 300Mbps and around 250Mbps for h265 which is about a 3-4X reduction in file size There doesn't appear to Neither the transcode time or the resulting file sizes would an issue. 264 files, which VLC will play, however I have not been able to get an NLE to display them. Almost every consumer camera uses h. Star wars a New Hope, Wrath of Kahn, Game of thrones X264 vs Reruns of Mash, Happy Days, and Rick and Morty H265 or AV1-STV. but the file size difference moving to ALL-I recording is still significant. H. Step 2. I just tried using prores as an export option and the file size is 18 times bigger than the usual size, it’s 8. You can see the image samples below (click to enlarge), even at 1:1 I can’t tell a difference – ProRes 4444. CPU encoding (5950x) takes a lot of time for me, not to mention a lot of watts. 265 vs H. Frames. Also I don't have ProRes option when exporting by Premiere. 264 do not and you need the entire GOP to get all the information so the computer needs to receive several frames before it can display one. g RAW 4K would eat too much storage but on a Prores 1080p project, I might switch to 4K or RAW for a shot that i might The large file size is probably going to lower performance vs something like ProRes 444 that is essentially lossless and much smaller files. 264 Long GOP Nikon footage, Especially if I need to clean it up a little or do any serious color correction. ProRes offers high color fidelity and a low compression ratio. 264 Editing w/ FCP X. 264 converter. So, irrespective of your platform, you'll likely see a performance boost when using ProRes in your video editing process. Instead of spending time transcoding to ProRes and buying plenty of HDD for the increased file size, I would suggest you just upgrade your cpu to 13700k or 13900k. This guide will discuss the differences between ProRes and H. 264, for that matter), the structural design of ProRes makes it more suitable for faster editing performance, especially for multicam While ProRes is a larger file size than H. The file size was 44 MB (7. 264 or HEVC, but more importantly, the intra-frame nature of the codec means that it’s much easier to parallelize the export process. 37 times larger than the original file size. usually still have some flavor of LongGOP (for “group of pictures”, or Yes, ProRes 422 is vastly better than any H. 81 MB (1. In theory I could go for even lower resolution but 1280x720 works without any lag for me so I'm sticking with that for now. Set stream encoder to x264) My MacPRO specs, OBS settings, description of recording and purpose are here Downside is double the file size you need (wonder if you can convert it down to 5000 again somehow A7iii’s H264 420 8 bit files are not that heavy for a modern pc like yours. mp4 @ 1080p to keep file size down. 264 vs H. Instead, we usually target a 15-20GB file size. ProRes 4444 Max Mbit/sec 1475 - 5K @ 25p ProRes can carry twice the data of H. On a PC, the Cineform 10-bit YUV or DNXHD/R options are both quite high in quality. not interframe (atleast for master files). I'm strictly interested in how far can I push the grades in these files. ProRes RAW vs. 13GB, encode time = 52s The file size is 7. Apple ProRes RAW May 2023 7 Data Rate fall between those of Apple ProRes 422 HQ and Apple ProRes 4444, as shown in the chart below. Secondly, there’s also one flavor of h. When I chose the 720 DNxHD mxf codec (it doesn't need to be It's less about what they can do and more about how important your source material is. ProRes 422 Many experts choose ProRes 422, for instance, since it provides a decent mix between quality and file size. If what YT does to video files results in better quality if I upload a ProRes file vs. RESULTS: H. ProRes files have higher ProRes Variants and Their File Sizes. 1. 265 and we have always had issues with Crashing and Freezing. The minimum total transcoding time will therefore be the sum of the time required to decode the file and the time required to re-encode it to ProRes. mov (422 HQ or 4444) and then open that up in Handbrake (free video converter) to make the final H264 . With that said, for most video Specifically, I am taking feature films with a ProRes 4444 source and exporting "Audio Reference" Quicktimes, which basically have all 16+ audio tracks same-as-source, but with a compressed 480p H264 picture, so that an Audio QC guy can check the sound in ProTools, but not have to have a 200GB file. Choosing the Right Codec. But with higher resolutions, even ProRes might need a RAID. 08GB for some reason. More posts you may like r/gopro. 94 fps - file size 583MB Running on Dell T3600, 6-core E5-1650@3. ProRes files are larger (due to less compression), easier to edit, and retain more quality. I've been using ProRes 422 as my editing files out of the Ninja, because they don't lag the workflow at all and recording H. 264/XAVC S-I, go ahead. ProRes 4444 is perfect for high-end post-production work, though, since it supports up to 12-bit color depth and For file-based transcoding of video files that have been encoded with other (non-ProRes) video codecs, transcoding to ProRes entails both decoding of the starting technique and re-encoding to ProRes. Compression comes in many forms. 264 Mon Oct 10, 2022 12:26 am If you are converting so that it is easier to edit on your system then why not use Prores 422LT or even Prores Proxy which should be a much smaller file size. 2GB per hour. I’m leaning toward DNxHD since I don’t deal much with Apple. ProRes Proxy files CAN be full frame (i. 264): - Coding Structure: Long GOP (Group of Pictures) It also provides higher image quality, compared to H. Export as an h. 264 MP4 at 12Mbps (there is a YouTube preset built-in), you'd be looking at a file size of more like 4GB. 265 or H. The good news is that you don’t need tip-top image quality when you’re editing, so you can choose a low-bitrate codec. 265 is designed to preserve as much quality as reasonable at lower bitrates, but at the cost of computational complexity. In the second, editing efficiency and image quality are the prime objects. 264 MP4, VP8 WebM, or ProRes QuickTime format. 265 codec from Atomos as the quality is said to be about the same as the ProRes 422 but the file sizes are dramatically smaller. I can't see any major difference with my Pico NEO 3. 264, it falls well short of the storage cost of RAW formats such as RED RAW. 265 and is still a lossy format. Larry ProRes RAW is Apple's answer to the need for high-quality, manageable file sizes in RAW video. But as I keep the Prores file as a back up, I may as well upload it to youtube. Some (H. BRAW (internally) And of course the file sizes are far more acceptable. 264, as it can achieve the same quality as H. smaller file size, speed of copying, ease of This looks great, slightly smaller than the ProRes(HQ) file 11. Using this source clip: Panasonic AVC/H. r/gopro. 264/265 use DCT compression for intraframes - so they are fundamentally very there is no discernible difference in image quality or benefit in editing performance between ProRes (non Using the 10-bit version of FFMPEG, it’s possible to output 422 10-bit H. Uploading ProRes files may require alternative platforms like Vimeo that support larger file sizes. The lowest-bitrate variation of the ProRes codec, intended for use in editing software as a smaller version of larger files like ProRes HQ. I had to render it in Prores 4444 UHD for another post production house, but the file size is over 260 gigabytes!? Why is it so massive. 264/265 NVEnc (Topaz uses) to Software/CPU x. In terms of quality, MOV files generally offer higher quality, as they support a range of advanced codecs like H. 264) 360MB: Samsung S22 (H. Winner: H. Rafael Amador June 10, 2012 at 2:48 pm. 73. 5 days if no errors creep up. ProRes is a compressed format, but one that aims to be “visually MXF vs ProRes vs DNxHD/HR for masters. Both codecs have similar quality when final size is the same. but as Cineform compressed file). 264 25Mbps, anything more and you dont really see much to any benefit on YT. 265 are At > Recording > Encoder > , should I select “Use Stream Encoder”, “x264” or “Apple VT H264 Software Encoder”? (auto-conf. are you supposed to be able to playback these new . 57. Movie Recorder also generates GIF files. 264 for reference, though it is not a good choice for an intermediate codec! And finally, for Variable Bitrate codecs, the numbers listed are averages. I rendered a UHD 30 minute I know there will be a big difference in file size and that editing in Prores is better for performance. (ie ProRes video files have a lower amount of compression compared to the more common H. Fast Convert H. 264/265 encoding (external tools) is minimal to not noticeable in general. ProRes LT. 264 files, because ProRes uses a higher bit rate and a constant quality mode. mov files(aka prores) normally? i can’t play mine back like usual without putting it into premiere. 264/H. The They want to reduce video file size by increasing block sizes CTUs, reducing noise and grain, and degrading gracefully over repeated encodes or low bitrate settings. 264 has high compression ratio making the file size is relatively smaller while Apple ProRes has low compression ratio making the files gigantic in size that further occupy a significant a ProRes vs H. There are two main reasons someone would record in ProRes - ProRes 422 -file size is 42GB H. Compared to the iPhone file (which can even be recorded in A-Log) it is clear that the Sony a7sIII sensor is much superior to that of the iPhone. 9MB with little or no noticeable differences in image quality. 0 firmware, let Cinemartin say in their tests a ProRes 4:4:4 video of 590MB was converted to H. And here's a detail of the image, scaled up 300% so you can see that there is no perceptual difference between the DPX and ProRes files. Let's quickly recap ProRes 422 vs ProRes 422 HQ. ProRes is overkill. Likewise, 430Mbs can be compressed into H265 at 30Mbs and with 320 frame Keyframes and be nearly identified in quality to the ProRes Solved: I have noticed that prores files work much faster on my pc than mp4 h264. If conserving file storage is important, you need to share project files with another editor, or you have a newer system, H. 264 and ProRes depends on the specific use case and intended distribution platform. Yes, but not. This is really going to depend on your storage constraints – it’s a tradeoff between image quality and file size. A collection of 4K video file sizes for a minute of recording with cinematic cameras, DSLRs, mirrorless cameras, and smartphones. This is because h. 60 seconds x 24 fps. Regarding BRAW, I compared it because I understand that 12:1 produces a file/bandwidth similar to Sony's h264 4:2:2 "all-intra", and to ProRes 422 LT. 264 and H. 959. (A7sii) was a dealbreaker here, but with the inclusion of H. Reply. Man i wish DR playback was that File size for 1 second. More posts you may like Top Posts Reddit . Yes, ProRes 422 is vastly better than any H. Also X264 if set right will give near same file size as X265 with far better I'm experimented using different presets and I found out that using GPU (h264 h265 Nvidia NVEnc, etc) will speed up the process significantly but outputs larger file size than using CPU (h264 x264). Within these two main formats sits 3 sub-categories exist such as ProRes 4444XQ, which is the highest quality version of ProRes 4:4:4:4 - it includes an alpha channel for visual effects and can support up to 12-Bit RGB and a 16-Bit alpha channel, with a target data rate of 500 Mbps. The file sizes are massive, and the workflow for raw content is not nearly as straight forward. Long GOP (H. 265 c. This can reduce size massively and keep great quality. 4. You can edit Apple ProRes files in the Photos app or iMovie on iPhone, iPad, and Mac, Final Cut Pro for iPad and Mac, or in third-party editing apps that support ProRes. 264, but it’s much easier on your system. 62GB vs 13. 264 may be the better choice. 265 at a comparable bitrate. So if you're converting an H. Well, I didn't perceive any difference quality wise (compared to the intra-frame H. Its overall bit rate is only 4. 265 to the point where it does look worse than a ProRes Proxy. Different variants of ProRes produce different file sizes. You're hopefully using PR 422 (or HQ) for mastering. MFX as mentioned above is a container that can hold intraframe or interframe codec. Final Cut Pro has been able to transcode your media into proxies for some time. A 2-minute 4K Youtube trailer: 675 MB; A 1-minute HD Youtube trailer: 60 MB; Smaller file sizes mean faster upload and download times, less storage space needed, and lower streaming costs—without sacrificing video quality. ProRes supports 10-bit color and retains more of the color than H. My understanding is that prores is a better choice. ” Now you’ll have the option of ProRes or H. ProRes 422, on the other hand, is the That would be interesting. PRORES was 81. 99% of the time you will not see any difference using ProRes 422 LT, which is much lower bandwidth. 4G H. Smallest file size, low to good quality, fewest number of concurrent movies, maximum specification resolution of 4k. ProRes Proxy will, generally speaking, look worse than an H. This is why many video creators convert or transcode their H. 30Mbs H265 = 100Mbs ProRes. So ProRes, DNx and Cineform qualify. 265 vs ProRes. 8-1. This tells us one of its key characteristics. 462. For instance, ProRes Proxy, the lowest quality variant, produces the smallest file sizes. 264 format if ProRes isn't supported. File sizes will be much more reasonable and the export is much quicker. Everything is fine but I am tempted to purchase the H. 264 file in . 5-3. 264 and PRORES rendered at similar quality, but H. 265 and H. 264 vs. So when you're creating proxies for being easier on your machine, why throw one of the hardest codecs to decode as your proxy format? It doesn't make sense. High Bitrate H264 at 4K - which option is better for punching in on interview subject? and not sure which is better: ProRes at 1080p vs. So, a master file of 1920 x 1080, creates a proxy file of 960 x 540. Just not directly out of After Effects. 264 proxies. I’ve been experimenting exporting using software x264 x265 encodes constant fr at quality 18-22 and the same with hardware (videotoolbox) encodes for 264 & 265. My assistant ended up converting to ProRes first and then converting to H264 which was probably overkill, but he felt it went faster than going I am trying to understand the relationship between video bitrate, image size, codec, and the file size. CRF 18 for x264 or CRF 24 for x265 should be visually transparent; anything lower will probably just waste file size. Apple ProRes is a codec typically used by editors as an intermediate codec to edit from. I'm using adobe encoder on a PC and would ideally like files (15-20sec clips) in under 200MB or so so it does not kill my net connection. Additionally, ProRes maintains high image quality with relatively manageable file sizes, striking a good balance between quality and efficiency. 264 uses long-GOP Apps might transcode a ProRes video to a smaller H. I am editing a project on Final Cut Pro X and was curious what format my video files should be for editing. And there, ProRes as an intraframe codec will play back much smoother than an H. 264 files, because ProRes uses less compression and retains more information. 264 increased the original file size by a factor of 4. ) are designed for viewing of a final product on media such as optical discs or streaming. 265 codecs currently used on the iPhone. if you care about file size, consider using Topaz 1st for upscale (ProRes) and then re-encode There is little need to use ProRes422 unless you are doing professional work and have unlimited storage. The pros and cons of Prores vs H264 have been discussed here often. Reddit Neither will work well as H264 and H265 are codecs that are designed for video playback at a low file size. For any serious editing it’s best to transcode HEVC or H. That's the wide gap between ProRes and H264 in data rates and output file size. It is the most widely used codec in the world. 9 less in size than x264 "Real Lossless" 422 10-bit Upscaling bit depth and chroma sampling increases file size a lot. BRAW (externally) vs. 265) is the successor of H. Codecs like Apple ProRes or Avid DNxHR are industry standards WMV (Windows Media Video) and MOV (QuickTime Movie) are both popular video file formats, each with distinct characteristics. Total video file size. The trade off, as you've noticed, is the significantly larger file sizes. 2GHz, NVMe SSD, GTX 1060 6GB GPU ffmpeg encode -> DNxHR SQ: file size = 4663MB, encode time = 1m30s Resolve optimized media -> DNxHR SQ: media size = 1. Another difference between ProRes and H. Interframe vs Infraframe codecs: “There are intraframe and interframe codecs. In addition, you will learn how to play ProRes files on Windows and how to convert ProRes to H. Moreover, it works with all QuickTime Movie Format (MOV), such as 8K, 4K, 2K, and so on, at 10-bit codec. 265 4K MP4 using bitrates between 50Mbps and 100Mbps. It's those settings or nothing. 23 is a good default for x264, and 28 is the default for x265. You can encode a 2Mbps h. Use which one works adequately for you. One downside of ProRes video files is their large size in comparison to the latter one. 264 to something else is probably a H. 264 using the ProRes H. 4% of the reference) The other file was created using "ffmpeg -i Reference. Great for file size and storage, not so much for editing large files. 264 and how it’s encoded which makes it more intensive to work with. 96 KB/megapixel-sec x 2. The only reason why it's not mainstream is fact that it was developed by 1 History & Background Origins of ProRes. Then brought the footage into FCPX, color corrected edited, added my titles and graphics and exported a . With that said, for most video professionals ProRes is the codec of choice for any work relating to a ProRes Variants and Their File Sizes. g. Can someone please Converting to ProRes increases the file size so dramatically and excessively that it's filling up my drives. HEVC compresses slightly differently, giving considerably better quality at the same bitrate / file size compared to h. 264 without Quality Loss . I know prores is a simpler codec then H264 for instance, but this just seems crazy. 265 quality vs file size question on the Sony A7s iii Technical You’re going to want to transcode the footage to ProRes or DNx for editing anyway (h. 264 files as backups. I'm told that H265 is not recommended as an editing codec and will slow my machine down. For example, a 10-minute 4K video at 30 fps can take up about 18 GB of storage space in ProRes 422, while the same video in ProRes has five set compression sizes in the family. Thats it. Render out a high quality prores . So if you can afford the space in camera and don’t mind the Firstly, I’m listing 1080p and UHD since they are the most common image sizes. Data rates vary based on codec type, image content, frame size, and frame rate. Many users run with ProRes proxy as it does well enough visually and plays back great. Open a 1080p H264 30FPS video and check its info on mediainfo. What you will see is better performance from your computer. I filmed this interview in both to see the difference and I feel the difference is very obvious. 30% smaller for Lt and about 1/4 for Proxy. 264 to something else is probably a The sell back then was it “produces stunning HD quality at SD file sizes”. MP4s (h. Our primary goal is insightful discussion of home audio equipment, sources, music, and concepts. 265 will be a very nice streaming codec. 264 or H. Intraframe means that the compression is done within the frame itself. JM Scanlon says: 2022-10-23 at 3:52 am. (such as XAVC or H. 264 is a distribution codec with a much smaller file size than ProRes. Then revert to the source for export. 1,440 frames. 264 files to ProRes before editing. But the ProRes file size is noticeably larger. 264 container gives me pause here, but it goes up to 600 Mb/s which is a lot of information P. ProresLT and Prores proxy will both reduce Was wondering if anyone has done any testing or recommendations on editing files that have been taken in H. But more recently, Apple added H. The target data rate of Apple ProRes 422 LT is approximately 102 Mbps at 1920 x 1080 H. As far as grading goes, how does a ProRes Proxy (~45Mbps) or LT (~102Mbps) file compare to a 150Mbps LongGOP H264 file (e. In fact, I'd be inclined to say ProRes clips are less likely to run into errors when encoding compared to H. It probably doesn't scale linearly, but you get the idea. 264) are terrible editing codecs as they were designed to optimize compression at the expense of lots of compute horsepower to encode/decode. 264: Video Quality. File size. a change of ±6 should result in about half/double the file size, although your results might vary. However you can squeeze the crap out of an H. q. Use ProRes, DNXHR, GoProCineform for editing. I have an RTX 3080 12 GB and I am currently videoing UHD 60p on GH5 and recording ProRes 422 on a Ninja V. Depending on your content, there may not be a perceivable difference in quality (if there is, you can bump up the bitrate). It offers exceptional image quality and detail preservation but with larger file sizes. 265 Sometimes (particularly for web work and documentaries) I use different file sizes or modes for different shotse. Prores is all-I, after all, and both Prores and h. Unless you’re doing a professional shoot, I don’t think it’s worth it. I have more than 300 videos between 3-10 seconds. 264) If i got footage in prores from the camera I'd leave it as that A while ago I did some tests on some interview footage I filmed exporting MP4 various quality settings in Resolve and then comparing it to exporting Prores from Resolve and converting to MP4 of a similar size using Handbrake. 264 is terrible to edit with. 264/265 are not intended as editing formats and they can be hell to work with even on high end machines) so you may as well go with the recording format that is more space Blackmagic RAW and ProRes RAW formats get compared in the DP Journey Youtube Video in terms of white balance, noise and detail, and more. To create proxies, just select your clip(s) in the browser, right-click, and select “Transcode Media. Edit a ProRes file. Prores 422 or above vs. 264 because it's less compressed, but is the difference significant if I shoot the h. 60 seconds x 959. 99 KB/sec. However, the trade-off is superior quality and editing flexibility. 264 and other compressed codecs. Solved: I have noticed that prores files work much faster on my pc than mp4 h264. 264 is the video quality. This means videographers can enjoy the benefits of RAW video — like extended color correction and fine-tuning options — without the massive file sizes Uploading a prores file can salvage a bit of grain which can be quickly lost if you upload an already compressed h264 file, then youtube compresses again and washes away all the fine details. My 150mb Handbrake file is better than a 600mb one from premiere. 264. 100+Mbps target Bitrate H264 at 4K. These differences are key when you’re shooting handheld all day. So why not H. 264 8-bit 4:2:0 UHD 59. Frame Dimensions: Frame Rate: ProRes 4444: ProRes 422 (HQ) ProRes 422: ProRes 422 (LT) ProRes 422 (Proxy) 720 x 486: 23. 264 to something else is probably a Having small file sizes would be amazing, but as it is an ultrabook, would Cineform provide better performance? Also, Cineform seems to be encoding much faster - I just tested a 4 minute file which was encoded in 1:05 in Cineform and 2:45 in h. It’s cheaper that way and saves transcoding time too. Unless you know your stuff and use a proxy workflow with your editing software or if you do not edit the videos, i'd say stick to h. ProRes creates larger files than H. The persistence of the H. ProRes File Size. data rates and produce larger file sizes. Hi! I have a 2-hour, 2GB H264 VOD I downloaded from one of my livestreams and Premiere Pro (CC latest version) freezes/crashes when I try to edit with it. So TLDR; h265 with GOPs more than 1 frame apart will always require higher bitrate ProRes files to retain the image quality of the uncompression of h265. 264? The hard truth is that H. Show more Less. for use in post-production that supports video resolution up to 8K. that was to illustrate the difference between prores/h264 and h265. Last week I posted about storage and filming in ProRes vs h. Just export to H. You could also split the difference and export ProRes 422. [1] Much like the H. 264 96 Bitrate -file size is 3. Most of our files come off the GoPro in H. YMMV. The HQ is high quality and larger file than 422, and LT is even lower than 422. They play it back in that format. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. And, while both ProRes 422 and ProRes 4444 are much larger than the original HEVC (or H. The choice between H. I convert them to prores, - 11337602 you've got to change the "flavor" of prores to change the file size but to get a smaller file size you will lose some quality. 264 footage in 10-bit 4:2:2? If it's a big difference, then is it even worth shooting the h. 264 file, I'm going to upload a ProRes file! Reply reply Whatever their file size limit is, it's not under 16GB. Top 2% Rank by size . 8gb big when the usual file size is 500gb with h. That’s what I understand about the h. Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Editing Codecs — H. 264 200 Bitrate -file size is 7G So what extent the improvement of video quality with the ProRes 422? For sure it's not 10x greater like the file size. HEVC: HEVC (also known as H. 264 and h. 100 Mbs h265 = 430 Mbs ProRes. 7 to an output video of 4. 264 will definitely get you further in terms of playback quality with a reduced file size, as mentioned. For this reason, many post-production facilites have abandoned ProRes and implemented a full DNxHR workflow. This means Windows users can read a ProRes encoded file, but in some cases cannot export one. The ProRes Colors seem to be more rich. I did a quick test. When I chose the first GoPro Cineform preset, the resulting file was 250GB (no thank you). File Transfer Time (minutes)* USB 3/Thunderbolt Drive : 0 LTO-6 Tape: 0 FireWire 800: 0 Home Broadband: 0 Commercial Broadband (1Gbps): 0 * actual time will vary by equipment You won’t see any difference in quality. 264 with half the file size. I just cant believe the difference. Editing Codecs — H. Members Online H264 is still the best option. This page covers all properties specific to the Movie Recorder type. Both offer few quality settings which translates to the TL;DR - h. Personally I feel Vimeo is a waste of money at the best of times but filling your account quota with Pro Res file sizes reduces its value even more. 264 bitrate is sufficiently high to compete. youtube and vimeo preserved the grain MUCH better than any h264 below 150 constant Mbps. The response was why would I even think about filming a long interview in ProRes. I'm uploading a 1080p 8 minute video right now with no issues. I found Handbrake could get much smaller file sizes with better quality. Some very high frequency images may see more benefit but by and large basically nothing compared to a decent bitrate h. I did check render at maximum depth in premiere. HEVC (and H. Edit in ProRes, deliver in h. Let you know how the Blue Ray turns out someday. Try the LT. ProRes vs H. I'm on Windows 7 with no ProRes. The quality difference probably minimal for iPhones. 264 in quality, file size, bitrate, and compression ratio. All my editing is done in DR Studio 17. Examples. 264 H. 265 from/to H. 264, how can I approximate the file size? We can ignore audio for the moment. e. 264/5 for capture due to file size. 265 HEVC with CINEC 2. 26x and MPEG standards, the ProRes family of codecs use compression algorithms If you are uploading to YouTube, ProRes is probably overkill. Uploading a bigger file like ProRes 422 is gonna be overkill for Instagram’s compression so the less they have to compress it, the better Reply reply - File Size: Intraframe codecs generally produce larger file sizes compared to Long GOP codecs like H. Look for HDDs on sale when they're $15/TB and move Difference between ProRes and H. Note: To fully configure any Recorder, you must also set the general recording properties according to the recording interface you are using: I have 53 minute documentary with red footage, and black magic raw. 264 files to Prores, color with those files, then export the colored clips with prores 422 or 444 for delivery? Reply reply More replies. ProresLT and Prores proxy will both reduce Here are the detailed differences between H. 264 and ProRes are fine for basic media playback, the HAP codecs were designed for the Re: File size of ProRes 422 v. 264 videos). Movie Recorder properties. Basically, H264 is a great delivery codec, but sucks as an intermediary codec. 264 is unlikely to make a significant difference to the end quality, providing your h. I've read that ProRes is better for grading than h. 265 will normally result in a smaller file size than 264 especially when compressing to ultra low bitrates for streaming and such. So unless you're using Vimeo as a file sharing site, to let other people download the file from there, then it doesn't make sense to upload it in any format other than h264. The banding on the premiere one is awful. The cost advantage of SSD over fast SD or CFe cards is the reason I bought 3 Ninja Vs. 264) 360MB: Read More: The Best Free Mobile Video Editing Apps for Creators. 264 proxies and the ability to change the frame size of the proxies. 264, for that matter), the structural design of ProRes makes it more suitable for faster editing performance, especially for multicam editing. 98 fps: 75 Mbps: 50 Mbps: 34 Mbps: 23 Mbps: 10 Mbps: 720 x 486: 25 fps: While ProRes is a larger file size than H. Different codecs are optimized for different purposes. HEVC is ideal for 4K or higher resolution videos, as it can reduce the bandwidth and storage requirements significantly. Uncompressed 12-bit RAW ProRes 422 HQ ProRes ProRes RAW I don’t think it’s yet known which ProRes format variant iPhone 13 supports. If you used something like an H. These files will survive being recompressed to ProRes Yes, ProRes 422 is vastly better than any H. the difference in quality between H. All video codecs look good when given enough bits, and all use similar DCT transforms to achieve their compression results. Everyone has their different needs though. Do you mean it is a better workflow to first convert the H. This makes them less suitable for uploading to the internet, as platforms such as YouTube have strict file size limits. ProRes was developed by Apple for their Final Cut Pro editing system, to replace AIC used in iMovie, which had more limited color depth The first thing Vimeo will do is convert your gorgeous ProRes to h264. ProRes, DNx and Cineform are all optimized for editing. How about ProRes 4K video? You must be jaw-dropping at a glance of data rates and file size. The Shinobi also runs 3x as long on a single battery vs the Ninja V. above 150 Mbps i couldnt see a difference between h264 and prores but at that point the filesize was so File Size Data Rate; 2k (2048x1556) In most cases, ProRes files should play off of a single very fast disk, if it's connected to the computer with a nice quick interconnect method (eSATA, Thunderbolt, possibly USB3). 6. Prores SQ ffmpeg commend below: Even plays 5k h. 3. I use Wise ssd and it last for hours on 4k DCI. X265 and AV1 don't compare to X264 in visual quality. ProRes files are larger than H. 264 for possible quality though much bigger in file size. 6 MB. Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy. H264 file and, it now looks like crap and looks slightly compressed, slightly, but enough to notice and not understand why it always looks like Log Vs. PR422 has 10bit and 4:2:2 chroma sub-sampling, h264 has 8bit and 4:2:0 unless you encode in the Hi422P Intra profile which isn't very well supported in the wild but offers 10bit and 4:2:2. 265) In order to keep the comparison blind, I then converted both the ProRes and H. 265 video codecs. Top 1% Rank by size . And there are real downsides to ProRes Raw. 264 files are smaller in size, more compressed, and have lower data rates than their ProRes counterparts, making them ideal for delivery, web upload, broadcast, and any other form of distribution. It was launched as part of Final Cut Studio 2, with the goal of providing a high-quality, efficient codec for video editing. Learn more about 4k video file sizes: (ProRes) 5. 264) are “long-GOP” files and require more computation to play back and edit; the GOP (Group Of Pictures) consists of a full video frame followed by several delta frames, which represent the differences between that frame and the initial frame, making ProRes 422HQ 10-bit is "Visually Lossless" but same time 1. Unfortunately, most cameras can’t record video directly to ProRes internally, but this is possible with external recorders. I’m asking because going with h264 means that I’d only need to run with an Atomos Shinobi (200g + batt) vs a Ninja V (400g + batt). 265/HEVC to/from In my experience I use prores 422HQ for H. Winxvideo AI - Easiy convert H. 264 file, and to the original footage, on both the HDR and SDR files), but the file sizes were obviously smaller and at least on my PC they performed very well on Premiere Pro (playback was as fast as with the intra-frame H. Cineform and DNxHR are intermediate codecs, so their size will be many times bigger than original h264 (for the price of easier decoding). Initially, ProRes was created to meet the needs of professional editors who sought a mix of quality and file size. 265, CRF ranges from 0 to 51. budgets, and sizes of speakers. 265 -> H. 264 footage in 10-bit versus 8-bit? FILE SIZE: H. I have uploaded Prores to youtube and yeah its doesn't make much difference to uploading the handbrake mp4. Youtube HD 1080p25 = 8 Mbps. 264 ProRes basically uses an all-I flavor of MPEG-2 encoding - that's the reason why you see all the blocking with highly compressed ProRes variants like Proxy or LT. However as implemented by Apple, default proxy files are 1/2 the resolution of the master file to reduce file size. 264, which is smaller file size but as it's long-GOP it forces the CPU/RAM to work a LOT harder for every frame. I see. h. ProRes 422 HQ is the premium option, no doubt. 264, you wont notice any benefit in fidelity. It is the successor of the Apple Intermediate Codec and was introduced in 2007 with Final Cut Studio 2. Posted by Daniel Clark on June 10, 2012 at 1:35 am No perceptable visual difference, smaller file size. ProRes 4444 is better for its intended purpose, which is NOT internet streaming. 264 files that visually match the quality of ProRes 444 10-bit at ~1/3 the file size (round 90Mbps)! It’s also possible to create 444 10-bit H. Think of Insta360 Studio as a keyframe and stitch program. I was only suggesting h264 for an intermediate codec if file size is crucial (in my case, for ftp). If you want to free up This is where ProRes steps in. 3x-4x more time while roughly 2x more watts for comparable file sizes and negligible VMAF difference compared to qsv encoding. 264 Cons Longer upload times. 264 is a much more efficient codec than ProRes. Exporting out of one generation (camera originals) of H. Neil The file size and bit rate will be higher but since you already set the ceiling of quality at ProRez then their version isn’t going to be any better. 5GB: Google Pixel 6 (H. This makes it optimal for GFX encoding while maintaining a smaller file size with high quality and performance. ProRes has grown over time, with Apple consistently developing the ProRes also has the benefit of coming in two main formats; 4:4:4: and 4:2:2. But all of these codecs can handle many other frame sizes as well. Even now I switch between RAW, ProRes, H. This codec is perfect for environments where storage capacity and data rate are at a premium. what's Wrong? Mon Apr 15, 2019 5:12 pm. less banding in shadows for example. 264 and HEVC are optimized for distribution. Archived post. First, the computer does indeed have less work to do with ProRes when compared to H. Compared to a decent bitrate h. 264 GH5 footage. On the other hand, ProRes 422 HQ, the The file size difference can affect the storage capacity, transfer speed, and upload time of your videos. 07 Mpixels. While H. dhrgqa cqryx apejkf vqwadj fban hpub ccpm wjepey nwtc qdvbdx